Return to rational payment machines, who

To spend money to buy things, there are quality problems, return money back is normal, but also to pay huge fees, it is estimated to make a lot of buyers can not accept. But in the purchase of excavator use there is such a case, the last who said that more rational, so that in this small series of secrecy first.

In March 2, 2013, Mr. Cheng bought a excavator worth 790 thousand yuan to a machine company in installments. The two sides agreed in the contract of sale, Mr. Cheng should pay the first payment before May 20, 2013, the balance of interest, as well as other deposit, management fees 728880 yuan, Mr. Cheng in July 20, 2013 to June 20, 2015 in 24 installments, the monthly payment 20 days ago. And Mr. Cheng did not pay a lot of money after the first payment, because of the quality of excavators and other reasons, and in January 20, 2014, the excavator returned to the machinery company.

"Excavator quality problems, I also returned things, why should pay the use of fees?" Cheng Cheng how to make it difficult to understand, he will buy the excavator bought by installments, returned to the business, did not expect to pay 170 thousand yuan fee.

This thought that the quality of the product itself has problems, and they will return the goods, Cheng think that no problem. Unexpectedly, businesses have to pay for their own use of high fees. Merchants believe that the two sides at the time stated in the contract, Mr. Chen overdue payment 45 days, businesses have the right to recover excavators, while Cheng also need to pay royalties.

The first month of the total price of 20%, second months of the total price of 10%, third months 7%...... In this way, 10 months, Mr. Cheng to pay about 600000 of the use of fees, deduct the down payment of 150000 yuan, Cheng also pay about 400000 yuan.

The common saying is fair and reasonable, and the husband says the woman is reasonable. In the end, how to judge, but the private estimate of the two sides can not solve the problem, and see what the professionals say.

In the case of Qiaokou District People's court judge Yang Li believes that according to relevant regulations, fees charged shall not exceed the cost of business and equipment using the same amount of compensation for damage, so the case use fee rental fee the same type excavator with reference to the market to count more appropriate. Mr. Chen uses excavators for 10 months, and the same type of excavator rents 17000 yuan per month. Mr. Chen should pay 170 thousand yuan (including down payment of 150 thousand yuan) to merchants.

Whether it's perfect or not, things are finally solved, and there's a deficit for both sides. Xiao Bian personally believes that the merchant's goods can not guarantee the quality of the user's biggest irresponsible, not just selling goods, even if the completion of the task, regardless of the problem of product after sale. As a buyer, Mr. Cheng did not use reasonable means to communicate with the merchant, but refused to pay the money when the product appeared quality problems. This behavior is not advisable.

Wonderful recommendation:

Bearings: "heterogeneous" industry development

Rescue Quilts: cranes under 110 thousand volts high pressure

Yuchai engine power, on par with the world level