Roller does not belong to motor vehicle, does not need to bear compulsory insurance
Road roller parked on the side of the road, by others rear end collision, should be responsible for it? Now we know, roller does not belong to motor vehicles, so do not need to bear strong insurance, no compensation liability. Please listen to the real case.
In June 21st this year, with the motor vehicle accident liability dispute case in Anhui province people's Court of Jingxian County, decided the roller does not belong to the vehicle because of traffic accident no responsibility, so all the people do not bear the vehicle to pay compulsory insurance within the scope of no fault liability.
2015 years 2 months 10 days, a week driving heavy dump trucks and the relative direction of hole driving heavy tractor by scraping, scraping, Zhou driving light and heavy dump truck parked on the roadside in front of Kemou collision, due to the inertia of light truck out of the right side of the road and pedestrian ruanmou phase scratch collide, roller and Shimou parked outside the road, causing Kemou Truck Ride Liu, ruanmou injured pedestrians. The accident was identified by the traffic police, Zhou main responsibility for negative accident, Kong, Ke negative accident secondary responsibility, Ruan, Shimou, Liu no responsibility. Zhou, a hole driving vehicles were insured with compulsory insurance and commercial three party insurance. Liu Yuan to court requires Zhou, Kong, as well as for the second vehicle insured two insurance companies to compensate for medical expenses and other economic losses of 19.9 yuan. In the trial, for Zhou, kongmou vehicle insurance two insurance companies have argued that the roller in the case of traffic accident no responsibility, but the roller owner should pay high insurance without liability within the scope of liability in motor vehicle.
After the court held that the "road traffic safety law of the People's Republic of China" stipulates that "motor vehicles" refers to the use of power driven or traction, on the road for the use of personnel or for transport of goods and special projects for the construction of wheeled vehicles. According to the above legal provisions, the roller obviously does not belong to the scope of "motor vehicle", so the owner of the road roller does not need to bear the liability of non liability compensation within the scope of compulsory insurance for motor vehicle traffic accident liability, which is not accepted by the two insurance company in the trial. After accounting, two insurance companies should assume compensation for Liu's economic losses were 10.2 yuan, 8.6 yuan. The verdict was as follows.
Therefore, owners of rollers should take a good look, understand their rights and responsibilities, in order to properly solve the problems.
